There’s been a discussion on Romance Divas about whether being a writer makes reading harder. That is to say – is it harder to throw yourself into the story and ignore the editing? Are you harder on books than you used to be? I am.
I love to read.
However, before I was distinctly aware of POV or tense, something in the story might have bothered me but usually I could get through it. Especially if it was a good plot. Now, those things pull me completely out of the story.
Lately I have read some really bad books. A couple of these I would have thought were bad whether I was a writer or not. One, I would have thrown up against the wall and then flushed down the garbeurator (sp?) if I could. Yes, it was that bad. Some of them were just bad because I recognised the editorial errors that, I believe, I wouldn’t have noticed before.
I have also read some really good books. A few of these books were so good that I may have overlooked some of the flaws. A book that sucks you in to the story can do that – you’re at the end without even noticing how you got there.
The thing that scares me is that some day someone will be reading my books (at least that’s the plan). How will they view them? As a writer? As a reader? And, will my writing pass the test? I am thankful I have a great CP who keeps me in check and on track. But then, didn’t these other writers have that too? Why didn’t they see the head hopping or past/present tense changes? Were they too scared to be honest with the writer? What’s the point of that?
What is it that makes a good book work? It is all so subjective, I know. What I think is good someone else doesn’t necessarily like. However, I choose to believe that someone can not like the plot of a book but still recognise good writing.